Carrington(B1)			(153)
Colburn(B1)			(153) xnr	tt TAw.t n iw.t(y)-x.t=f
Colburn(B1)	hard one to		(153) the captive!	Theft is natural to the one who has nothing;
Vygus(B1)			(153) xnr twt TAwty n iwty xtw =f
Vygus(B1)	is the		(153) prisoner. Theft is natural to him without possessions.

Carrington(B1)	(154)
Colburn(B1)	(154) xnp x.t in xni	sp bin iw.ty-Swiw
Colburn(B1)	(154) the theft of things by the criminal	(though it is) an evil occasion (to) the one who is not lacking, 1
Vygus(B1)	(154) xnp xtw in xnr sp bin nty Swtw
Vygus(B1)	(154) Possessions are snatched by the criminal. That which is lacking
Nederhof(B1)	(154) ... sp bin iwty Swiw
Nederhof(B1)	(154) ... An evil act without need (lit. emptiness), 2

¹ Read so because I think the overall contrast is between iw.t(y)-x.t=f and =k in line 155.
² i.e. a crime not motivated by poverty.

Carrington(B1)	(155)
Colburn(B1)	(155) nn rf Ts.tw im=f		HHy n=f pw		iw=k swt sA.t(i)
Colburn(B1)	(155) one shall not bear a grudge about it,		he is one seeking for himself.		You, on the other hand, are sated
Vygus(B1)	(155) nn r =f Tss tw im =f HHy n =f pw iw =k swt sAt
Vygus(B1)	(155) it is not blamed because of it, it is self-seeking. You are sated
Nederhof(B1)	(155) nn rf Ts.tw im=f
Nederhof(B1)	(155) is it not to be censured?

Carrington(B1)	(156)
Colburn(B1)	(156) m t=k tx m Hnq.t=k	iw=k xwd.t(i) m sSr.w
Colburn(B1)	(156) with your bread, drunk with your beer,	you are rich in every
Vygus(B1)	(156) m t =k txt Hnqt =k iw =k xwdt m sSrw
Vygus(B1)	(156) with your bread, drunken on your beer. You are rich with every (type) of linen.