Carrington(R)	(8.2)
Colburn(R)	(8.2) xnn sdb=f Hr mw npnp.t=f
Colburn(R)	(8.2) the landing of its fringe was on the water, (that of) its hem

Carrington(R)	(8.3)
Colburn(R)	(8.3) Hr it	Sm.t pw ir.n sx.ty pn Hr wA.t
Colburn(R)	(8.3) on the barley. 1	This peasant went on the way

¹ Not a case of *wn.in sDm.n=f derived from iw sDm.n=f, as I had first thought, but a textbook example of the emphatic form. Credit to Jenny Carrington for noticing that the second n in xnn precedes the determinative.

Carrington(R)	(8.4)
Colburn(R)	(8.4) n.t rmT(.t) nb.t	Dd.in nmty-nxt pn ir hrw
Colburn(R)	(8.4) of all humankind 1	Then this Nemtnakhte said, "Take care,

¹ rmT.t (so proposed by Mark-Jan Nederhof) because of the feminine adjective. M.-J. N. interprets n.t rmT.t nb.t as "public".

Carrington(R)	(8.5)
Carrington(B1)		(33)
Colburn(R)	(8.5) sx.ty
Colburn(R)	(8.5) peasant,
Colburn(B1)		(33) (i)n xnd=k Hr Hbs.w=i	Dd.in sx.ty
Colburn(B1)		(33) will you trample my clothes?" 1	Then this peasant said

¹ in for n suggested by Mark-Jan Nederhof on the basis of versions R and Bt.

Carrington(B1)	(34)
Colburn(B1)	(34) pn iry=i Hs.t=k nfr mtn.w=i
Colburn(B1)	(34) "Let me do what makes you happy, let my ways be good." 1

¹ Would these phrases be stock polite apologies in Egyptian, equivalent to "Excuse me, I beg your pardon"? It's the subjunctive s{V}Dm{'a}=f in both. The second sentence might be vocalized "ne-fra mi-'tan-wi".

Carrington(B1)	(35)
Colburn(B1)	(35) pr.t pw ir.n=f r Hrw	Dd.in nmty-nxt pn
Colburn(B1)	(35) He came out (of the path) upward.	Then this Nemtnakhte said:

Carrington(B1)	(36)
Colburn(B1)	(36) in-iw n.k Sma=i r wA.t	Dd.in sx.ty pn nfr
Colburn(B1)	(36) "Is my Upper Egyptian barley to be a road for you?"	Then this peasant said: "Let